No specific subclasses for fields?

[daybyter]

Hi!

There are no Field subclasses for Field for specific fieldsm like NoRelatedSym, MDReqID etc? Is this intentionally, so you have to use new Field( , ) ? Make the sources no very usable, I think? I wrote me a simple code generator in Python to create subclasses from a simple text file. Maybe this costs some performance, but creates nicer sources?

Ciao, Andreas

[penberg]

@daybyter I strongly recommend you have a look at Philadelphia FIX engine, which is much more feature complete and probably faster too.

/cc @jvirtanen

[jvirtanen]

@daybyter Yes, you might want to take a look at Philadelphia, which is designed based on Falcon and Libtrading. It is currently more complete than Falcon, and contains definitions for all FIX 4.2, FIX 4.3, FIX 4.4, FIX 5.0, FIX 5.0 SP1, and FIX 5.0 SP2 message types, tags, and enumerations.

I have prepared a small example that shows how to log onto GDAX using Philadelphia.

[daybyter]

Thanks a lot for your hints! I'll take a look.