Robert Pająk

Hi. First of all, I want to say that I feel sorry that you had to wait so long for any feedback. I am leaning towards saying that this is...

I am assigning myself, but anyone can work in parallel with me.

I could work on this but it would be nice to have https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/pull/5093 merged first to reduce the amount of conflicts.

I remember what was my idea. It was to use Processor as decorators in order to make modifications. A processor can modify the received record before passing to the next...

> The processors after a mutation should receive the mutated record. Where is it defined? What do you think about updating the specification?

I think it is "in spirit" of the specification. I would rather ask the Specification SIG if it is an acceptable design and clarify the specification.

I created https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/issues/4010

It looks that the TC wants to have a possibility so that the mutated record will be passed to next registered processor without forcing the user to make a decorator....

I created https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/issues/4065

> > W3C baggage propagator keys are NOT percent encoded. Only the values can be percent encoded. See: https://www.w3.org/TR/baggage/ > > You are right. I should keep the behavior of...