Pekka Klärck

I don't consider this important enough to be added in already late RF 4.0. Can be included in RF 4.1 if there are concrete needs.

Being able to remove `NOT RUN` keywords using `--removekeywords` could be handy. Not super important but if someone would be willing to provide a pull request the functionality could certainly...

For the reasoning why we have keywords with the `NOT RUN` status see #3842.

This sounds reasonable. Making the check only after filtering tests is probably more complicated than what we do now, but it certainly ought to be doable. Are you interested to...

It has never even occurred to me to use async functions as keywords, but I guess that's something we could support now that we are dropping Python 2 support in...

We are anyway dropping Python 2 support in RF 5.0.

~Python 3~ Python 2 support has been removed so it's now easier to experiment with this.

Ooops, that was a bad typo. Python 2 support has been removed. :smile:

What benefits would that bring?

When you use templates and want run multiple iterations per test, then the keyword used as a template needs to take care of possible iteration specific setup/teardown activities. With keywords...