Pekka Klärck

Sounds good to me. Are you @AllanMedeiros, or someone else, interested to create a PR? Should be pretty straightforward. The only design decision I see is deciding should with dicts...

Options `key`, `value` and `both` sound good to me. Probably should also support `True` and I guess it should be same as `both`.

If the ignore case functionality would be enabled, we obviously should ignore it with non-string values. It should probably be used with nested lists/dicts, though, but that that makes the...

Being able to log from threads, even only to the debug file, would be great. This is pretty complicated stuff (mainly because our logging is a mess internally...) and I...

Sorry for not looking at this issue or PR #3917 lately. There have been many other higher priority issues targeted for RF 5.0 and this was forgotten. I now looked...

I assume you mean name-value pairs like with suite metadata? Tests already have tags and documentation and I don't think them getting such metadata would add too much value. Could...

I assume you mean [typing.overload](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.overload). As you can read from its docs, overloading information isn't available at runtime and thus not accessible for Robot. Robot only sees the last definition....

Do you mean Robot should have its own `@overloads`? Could you clarify what benefits it would bring? Related to that, what should happen with the example in the original description?

Quick comments: - Process library documentation explains that `Run Process` can hang if there's lot of output and the output is not redirected to a file. - Redirecting is done...

Any new information related to this? Can you confirm the exact same tests works in exact same environment with RF 3.1 but not with 3.2? Can you provide a simple...