Petr Hála
Petr Hála
Closed in favour of https://github.com/scylladb/scylla-cluster-tests/pull/6886
Reviving this again @yarongilor @roydahan. Does this PR still make sense and if so what needs to be resolved (except conflicts) to get it over the finish line?
What was the time to scaleout?
> Updated results with runs at 70% and 50% load. Thanks, * Did you add the nodes in the parallel? * Regarding latencies, it seems like way too much, do...
> > > > @yarongilor , do we have runs on 2023.1? @yarongilor Could you please rebase this and try it out on 2024.1 so we can push this over...
> > [@fruch](https://github.com/fruch) , it is 0.2.0 but the test was for rc4 and investigation should have been finished today, so there is no sense to rerun > > I...
Just FYI: I created an alternative solution that utilized precommit in https://github.com/scylladb/scylla-cluster-tests/pull/10385
> `pre-commit` easily may be disabled at some point in time by an individual with idea that it is either `slow` or `requires some system packages`... > So, this approach...
> @scylladb/qa-maintainers waiting for you feedback, on which approach would be more useful (we can mix and match, for example nemesis with pre-commit hook, and docs with comments on PR...
I am unable to reproduce https://jenkins.scylladb.com/view/master/job/scylla-master/job/byo/job/dtest-byo/1363/testReport/update_cluster_layout_tests/TestUpdateClusterLayout/. I think a8d6b0c054d87031b4ce84eaeea2afaeb4f95678 helped with this a lot (lowering the concurency to 10). It seems that it still might trigger, but I have no...