Carter Carlson

Does changing state on L2 have the same impact on L1 as changing state on L1? Ie. adding new variables increases state vs. modifying existing state variables does not. I've...

Okay, that makes sense. What I'm asking is about the difference in: - modifying existing state variables - adding new state variables For a transaction on L2. Do new variables...

IMO it's worth having a predeploy to provide some bridge back to L1 state.

@tynes IMO is the state bloat of a mapping storing every hash is worth it- otherwise, additional contracts will need to store historical block hashes and the additional redundancy may...

@roninjin10 Huge fan of this PR- monitoring services will need to scale as other projects launch op-stack L2s as the chain monitoring services are crucial to secure operations. I mention...

I think we just need someone to champion the dev.

@hrkrshnn how about now? :pray:

Can we add `Solidity` support here as well? It may be worth integrating the registry on the contract level.

From the Frax side (currently operating on a non-superchain), I have a some opinions/questions: - It may be worth allowing `superchain => non-superchain op-stack` but not `non-superchain op-stack => superchain`....

IMO cross-chain ownership should be delegated to the initial point of token issuance and is a requirement to this standard. If ownership is not desired, it can always be renounced....