mind
mind copied to clipboard
Decide together.
Democracy in general has an issue dealing with issues impacting minority groups. Tyranny of majority can often occur. Because of this often such issues are delegated to courts. But maybe...
Now that we are using statistical quorum we can also do more complicated statistics. For example, we could ask people to self-identify in various groups (for example, people of color)...
When a user does not vote themselves, their vote can be computed based on their delegates.
From: https://github.com/mitar/html-sanitizer-testbed Also publish our HTML sanitizer as a separate package?
Migrating from [this comment](https://github.com/peer/mind/issues/205#issuecomment-277483616): Allow meeting items to be processed and go to next item. See attached picture  cc @icmeyer
Maybe only people who RSVPed (#184).
Add feature to make "banners" in the meeting. These banners would split up the meeting into different segments such as a consent agenda/items with motions/discussions See attached picture 
We could offer extra security by allowing admins to enable [Fido U2F](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_2nd_Factor) tokens for authentication and voting. So this could be optional for users, or required. But once Fido U2F...
Consider using [Quill](https://quilljs.com/guides/why-quill/) instead of Trix (current editor) for rich-text (HTML) inputs. Trix serves as well, and I like it, but Quill has some features which could help with collaborative...
We should also allow an optional rich-text comment when closing a motion. It should also be allowed to edit it later on.