Pedro Gomes

While I understand the motivation for creating EVM-specific standards for Wallets... there is nothing new or extra that ERC-7846 provides that isn't already covered by CAIP-222 https://chainagnostic.org/CAIPs/caip-222 Why restrict such...

Shouldnt this be closed in favor of the recently merged #282

Just sharing here some developments on this CAIP... after discussing it with several teams who gave very valuable feedback 1. The interfaces have been changed to follow a JSON-RPC structure...

This PR now includes 3 proposals: - CAIP-282 -> Browser Wallet Discovery Interface - CAIP-294-> Browser Wallet Messaging for Extensions (window.dispatchEvent) - CAIP-295 -> Browser Wallet Messaging for Iframes (window.postMessage)...

Then the wallet must reject it with 7001 code for invalid method Or partially reject it with an error message in the batch

@jxom there is only one concern with introducing wallet_disconnect here... the different payloads have different purposes So is the intention to batch them together as a batch "disconnection"... for example...

This would be a great initiative! As we already have other synergies as for example regarding CAIP-122 which generalizes EIP-4361 for any chain ecosystem

Hey @lukasrosario that's a great question but I think it applies for both single-chain and multi-chain Atomic Batching What is the intended behavior for ordering even in a single-chain scenario?...

This can be closed in favor of the already merged #8771

Fair enough! Personally do not have strong opinions on this particular approach but I believe that inevitably we will get to a point where this information will be provided by...