Pedro Lamas

Well, it is possible... though at the moment, links don't work, images don't work... 

Not fond of having it in blue, that's my main take! Having said that, I think that that area is starting to get a bit overcrowded, so we need to...

This is perfect, I'm just waiting for feedback on this first https://github.com/Arksine/moonraker/pull/485 If we get a "public" root available, then we might just make use of it and have the...

I really like this idea, and I think it will be something we can add on a next release! 🙂

Moonraker recently started exposing Klipper `output_pin` entries and `gcode_macro` via `[power]` elements, and that will in turn show on Fluidd Devices menu, so that they can be easily toggled on/off!...

Though I do like this idea, Klipper now provides the `SHAPER_CALIBRATE` command that will run the auto-tuning for the input shaper directly from Klipper and suggest some parameters from the...

Quick question on this: why are we doing calls via the HTTP endpoint instead of using the socket? Mind you, we can use data urls for file contents (we do...

I made some changes (on a separate PR that @BastelKlug just merged to his), specifically: - removed the direct calls for "oneshot" calls (instead there is now a createFileUri method...

> I don't think Moonraker supports file downloads via the socket, see [moonraker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/web_api/#file-download](https://moonraker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/web_api/#file-download). I think [getFile](https://github.com/fluidd-core/fluidd/blob/dbce4450c716604a0867bc297e057ccabd660a78/src/mixins/files.ts#L69) can be used here with some modifications (hiding the progress modal) instead for cleaner...

I think I finally got this working correctly with the socket (files are still downloaded directly though)