Jack Pearkes

Hey all. In trying to understand the root ask here I think I came back @jsoriano's point here: > The fact is, there's really a glaring hole in the Vault...

@vchan2002 Yeah great question -- you're right the current `consul_service` does the wrong thing. This plan does actually involve changing the `consul_service` resource -- with an attempt to make it...

@tecnobrat Not planned as part of this, but can you maybe open a separate issue on this repo that explains the use case and some examples?

@vchan2002 `consul_catalog_entry` is using same APIs and similar behavior as the upcoming version of `consul_service`, but in some cases it won't matter either way. `consul_catalog_entry` will require more modifications to...

@sriyer Would happily discuss my point of view and hear about the approach you took. If you could upstream it even better. I haven't gotten to thinking about implementation for...

I think the best practice here is actually to fail for a data_source. Changing that won't be easy based on current usage. It is possible we could set the behavior...

Would this assume that you have configured your installation to set auth anonymous for administrators? http://docs.grafana.org/installation/configuration/#auth-anonymous If so, I agree this would be a good option, given what seems to...

I :heart: this idea! Here's the steps I think we need to do: - Power off the droplet (get user confirmation here) - Snapshot the droplet - "transfer" the snapshot...

Nice, great points, I agree we should just say that you need to be explicit about the keys, and also about cleaning up afterwards and deleting the snapshot. Backups, yes....

Yea, this is a cool idea. I see the use case (I name my machines the same way per project). I think we'd want to make this opt-in, though, perhaps...