Markus Sabadello

@babisRoutis We'd love to do that but have little experience with it. Could you maybe describe what we'd have to do? If it's something we need to do in the...

Can you clarify what you mean with this issue? This library does not create DIDs. It implements the DID syntax and DID document data model. If you want to create...

@Muthurajj Yes, in general DIDs created by uniregistrar.io or godiddy.com should work with third-party applications. But one question is always, which DID methods does the third-party application support? For example,...

Yes let's merge, go ahead..

In my opinion, expired/rotated keys should simply not appear in the DID document at all. This is an inherent drawback of the did:web method. One thing that could potentially be...

Universal Resolver uses this driver for `did:web`: https://hub.docker.com/r/uport/uni-resolver-driver-did-uport/ (it says last updated 6 months ago). Maybe the underlying code has already been updated, and only the Docker image needs to...

Or is there another implementation of `did:web` than https://github.com/uport-project/uport-did-driver that the Universal Resolver should be using instead?

The way I would put it is that neither the method name, nor the method-specific identifier, nor the basic DID CRUD operations should say anything about the type of the...

I support this too, this is very important and forward-looking work! Also nice to see this already supported in the Universal Resolver, thanks to Dyne :) https://dev.uniresolver.io/#did:dyne:sandbox.test:JBdcDrTMkEuR8A2QnMQLRDXBL82AKxTpuHkxhmzgdkVH

Just in case people are not aware, last week at the [DID WG Virtual F2F meeting](https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/Meetings/F2F/2020.11.VirtualTPAC.html), @dhh1128 presented new work on the [DID Rubric document](https://w3c.github.io/did-rubric/) that introduces new criteria for...