pe-ro

That could work too. But, `` requires `@func`, which currently only allows the following values: - alternating - interchanging - mixed What's the relationship between the meter signatures in this...

I'm fine with re-opening the issue, but I think so-called "combined" time signatures will require a lot more thought and support for them should be delayed until v. 5.0.0.

``` Perhaps we even need two more values: "duplicative" or "equivalent" may be correct in the case of, say, C 4/4, where each of the the signature parts may be...

@axgeertinger, I have no doubt such things exist. And perhaps there should be ways to render them. However, we have to dig deeper and find out the intended meaning behind...

Based on our decisions about modern time signatures, we can undertake a similar approach to mensuration signs.

@axgeertinger, you're absolutely correct about "C" standing for "common time". It's incredibly English-centric and anachronistic. So, I suggest we change ``` Meter.sym attribute values for CMN. Common time; i.e. 4/4....

@axgeertinger, I also see your point about using `@count` and `@unit` in both `` elements -- ``` ``` but this is the most descriptive method. To indicate which `` element;...

Absolutely !

@ndubo, I believe each of the meter signatures in your example can be encoded using my proposal above. For example, the last one would be -- ``` ``` Both meter...

`` needs some work, but it should not be discarded.