pe-ro

@rettinghaus, by all means continue with PR #799. I hope you'll note my comments there -- comments which led to creation of a this PR which has the same motivation...

Sorry for the confusion. The separation of this PR from #1371 is due to 2 things: - an attempt (perhaps misguided) to create requests that are as atomic as possible;...

@bwbohl, sorry for not responding to this sooner. Thanks for helping me out. I think it will be easier for everyone, including me, to remove/mark-as-a-draft/whatever the pull requests I submitted...

Sorry, now I'm more confused. Should I create a new pull request from a new branch or leave things as they are?

If that's easier for you, it's fine by me. Is anything else required of me?

OK, but there will be conflicts between my suggestions and those of #799.

Got it. Thanks again.

I'm returning to this PR after quite some time, and I'm a little confused. I'm pretty sure that the PR included a new `` element, but I don't see it...

Never mind. I see that `` is actually addressed in #1366. Sorry for the churn.

How about adding a `@bracket.slope` attribute on `` and `` in their respective `*.vis` classes? Using this name will make it clear that the attribute controls the slope of the...