pdobacz

Expanding on the comment left in https://github.com/omisego/devops/issues/100#issuecomment-504457243. > it seems that that byzantine_events array is returning a limited number of events For the sake of clarity - it is not...

Shall we stick with (1/) on this one and close it with `wontfix` label?

Hey, wanted to drop some quick notes on this. Let's talk perhaps to get into the details: > 2. Fees OMG.ChildChain.FeeServer (how much fees we're charging currently loads via file,...

> Did you have a fanout exchange model in mind? Yeah, that fits, but I'm not super fluent with these models, so sorry about hand-waviness. > > the "slave" ones...

@pnowosie > 1. How we can provision another instance of ch-ch? > We'd need to pick one of the alive slaves, freeze it (make sure it won't consume its queue)...

> AMQP is not able to give you guarantees that any other slave has the same picture as master previously had > ... > AMQP alone is not ensuring consistency...

> what happens with transactions not yet included in a block? Wait, I think there might be a misunderstanding lurking here. `slave` would not allow the txs from `txMQ` to...

> Slave consumers would leave TXs on the MQ broker? yeah, or anywhere in the pipeline, where it would make sense, but before hitting the `slave` app (i.e. the `OMG.State`...

Just one thing I want to mention: It'd be good if the approach taken here took into account the protocol extensions that might require merklization of the state (that is...

https://github.com/omisego/elixir-omg/pull/1066 is a small experiment I did, related to this topic here.