Peter Dimov
Peter Dimov
Also, supporting `(name, underlying-type)` will make the FIXED macros unnecessary.
> Why is here no activity since 2022? I've been busy with other things, sorry. I'll try to get back to this before 1.86 ships.
Makes sense in principle but I'd need to add another primitive, `describe_type`, from which to return it, as there's no good place for it in the existing ones.
I'll take care of the MSVC failures. However, while this is an interesting simplification, I intended to add `name` to the base class descriptors, and this makes it impossible. I'll...
> but would you be using the same macros to name bases ? There's no separate macro for bases, it's invoked as part of BOOST_DESCRIBE_STRUCT and BOOST_DESCRIBE_CLASS. So yes, it...
I don't know of a better way.
Maybe update this to use enum_from_string and enum_to_string?
I already added fmtlib examples.
Yes, but we can add an `operator