Pieter De Gendt

I've opened https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/100565, please try if this resolves the issue on your system.

> I'm afraid [#100565](https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/100565) is not trying to report this sort of packaging issue to the user. I'm afraid [#100565](https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/100565) is trying to **hide** that sort of conflict with a...

They are locked when running in CI see https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/e09d0adf577189d906febab93358ff3ac2be5e18/scripts/requirements-actions.txt, but we can't pin by default as downstream projects might require different minimum/maximum versions. That's why we let `pip` handle the...

> > The west packages pip command collects all dependencies first, and if called with --install passes them to a **single** pip process, > > No, there are TWO `pip`...

> This being said, I still don't think it's a great user experience to have sneaky west and PyYAML **downgrades** buried in a list of more than 100 package installations,...

> Is there anything else you might suggest? Nope, I'd suggest to wait for the feedback from the Architecture WG now.

@marc-hb I'm not sure if @fouge is very active? I think we can move forward with this?

Let's wait for feedback from @marc-hb, as he requested some more time.

> > throw it on the pile of neverending DT tech debt, w/e > > @decsny, I could not understand why you are trying to do. Another [PR](https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/100085), extracted from...

> Could the devicetree be expressed as below instead using the `zephyr,user` or `chosen`? > > User can still define the node name and pick that in an static configuration....