Incorrect indentation in the Example of clause 7.12.6 (DeveloperExtensions dictionary)

[AmyLin2013]

Describe the bug In clause 7.12.6, Example, the code sample for the DeveloperExtensions dictionary appears to have inconsistent indentation.

The current example reads: << /Type /DeveloperExtensions /BaseVersion /2.0 /ExtensionLevel 24654 /URL (https://www.iso.org/standard/79150.html)

In this snippet, the lines starting from /BaseVersion /2.0 through the closing >> are not indented, which is inconsistent with the indentation style used in other dictionary examples in the standard.

For consistency and readability, the entries and the closing >> should be indented one level, for example:

<< /Type /DeveloperExtensions /BaseVersion /2.0 /ExtensionLevel 24654 /URL (https://www.iso.org/standard/79150.html)

This is an editorial issue only; the semantics of the example are correct.