Pier Luigi Buttigieg

@ruthiemusker Thanks! A set of invites have been sent. I don't think we need a whole ontology for resilience (as the folder name suggests), but the material is very interesting....

@r0sek perhaps you'd like to assist with marine ecosystems based on https://github.com/EnvironmentOntology/envo/issues/1556#issuecomment-2532133465

@timalamenciak posted > I think I've got a reasonable handle on the ROBOT template syntax. Just to be clear: we are minting each of the realms, biomes and ecosystem functional...

this is [the robot template derived from the one we're using for CMECS](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sgi_3SSNPLq1dSWtsRyhsRsRL1nwyo66T_i2LfONHQ8/edit?usp=drivesdk), with an example we would have to update some of the fields, like creator to match dc:creator...

Further, we would split EFGs like "Tropical-subtropical lowland rainforest" into * tropical lowland rainforest * subtropical lowland rainforest (note [that existing classes may be sufficient](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000384), in which case we can...

> I did a quick term synthesis. > https://publish.obsidian.md/mbn-notes/Data/Terms/Physical+Geography+Terms thanks @ben-norton - this shows how much some logical rigour is needed. Many of these definitions aren't very useful to tell...

possibly a mismatch between how the [pattern file was written](https://github.com/EnvironmentOntology/envo/blob/master/src%2Fenvo%2Fpatterns%2Fbiome.yaml#L31) and how I phrased / axiomatised the biome defs in the end. The former should be adapted to the latter.

> Note that not all biomes can be defined this way without also introducing the ecosystem shadow There should indeed be an ecosystem class for each one. The quality will...

Permafrosts can lack soil altogether, but we can try to add a class for soil in a permafrost "state"

Relevant to #809