Paulmichael Blasucci

I'm generally a fan of this, with one exception... Instead of add `Result.get` can we -- pretty please -- _deprecate `Option.get`_? I'd even be happy with both modules having a...

@theprash Oh, for sure. I'd like to see them _both_ go the way of the dodo. And, in truth, I'd expect changes to the surface of `'T option` and the...

@cartermp for what it’s worth, I also have a strong preference for option one. I’m not keen on weakening the effectiveness RQA. Tangentially, there was a recent Twitter thread where...

As long as we're talking about extending UoM, I've always wondered why unsigned integers aren't supported? And would it be much work to include support for them?

I’m all for this. But while we’re at it, could this also include emitting the assembly-level extension attribute as well? This is needed for compatibility with VB. Effectively, stick `[]`...

I usually wind up adding some variation of this suggestion to every project on which I work. So, yeah, having a very efficient version of this "in the box" would...

First off: I am in favor of setting .NET 6 as the minimum target runtime. :tada: As for collapsing the libraries... I can´t think of a technical way to prevent...

Aaahhh... I see. That's actually more reasonable. 👍

I've not used ProjectScaffold for quite some time, so I don't have any _direct_ feedback (yet... though personal life is taking me out of the community for a bit). But...

I'm generally in favor of this idea (though I do tend to modify my `build.fsx` rather heavily...)