Patrick Totzke

Thanks again for your quick response Jelle! Quoting Jelle van Assema (2020-07-04 20:23:33) > I am observing some really strange behaviour trying to reproduce your > approach. > Could you...

> I tried to replicate the error from this snippet, but I couldn't exactly. I did however run into another issue that might be the underlying cause of this. Because...

Could you explain what's going on here? It looks like every call to `check50.check` will cause `init` to be called. ```python import check50 @check50.check() def item_exists(): pass @check50.check() def item_still_exists():...

That sounds like a plausible explanation but your fix seems to have no effect: ```terminal [~/tmp] python --version Python 3.8.3 [~/tmp] check50 --version check50 3.0.10 [~/tmp] ls -la pset-init total...

The bug I described above is somewhat unrelated to the original feature request. In fact, although the pset module gets interpreted multiple times, the actual checks are run only once...

Thanks for your reply Chad. Quoting Chad Sharp (2020-07-06 19:17:49) > So there's two ways GitHub is used by check50. > > 1. is where the actual checks are located...

I'm going over old/stale commits towards making a release soonish. Would you like to repackage this with the extra option and include in a release? I think I now tend...

@dependabot rebase

Quoting Gustavo José de Sousa (2024-01-12 11:50:21) > Describe the solution you'd like > IMO, we should apply the modifications to only the currently matched messages. I don't think this...

I suppose it is a wontfix, yes. The thing is that the set of matched IDs can be *huge*. Just search for `*` and you get all messages, which can...