payne911

 A first step in the right direction. Not there yet, though.

That's a good idea. I would have to think about how I would integrate that into the UI. Moreover, I think this could actually help with the restriction on the...

That is looking like some really great work: I'll review the PR in the coming days. Thanks a lot for your contribution ! Are you aware of whether it would...

(Sorry, I thought changing the title would link the other issue, but I ended up having to edit your OP.)

> `document.addEventListener('pjax:end', init);` Is that what fixes #9 ? Also, does Violentmonkey require the script to be within that `(function() { /* code */ })();` wrapper ?

Would you mind creating 2 extra PRs for the fixes of #4 and #9 ? I'd do it myself, but I'll respect your "ownership" of the solutions, in case you...

Alright, #25 was perfect, thanks for that! I tried to incorporate your fix for #9 but couldn't get it to work properly. Have you tested if those cases work properly:...

Alright, now that I've incorporated both of your side-fixes into the main branch, it could be interesting to look into what this actually has to offer. Have you tried incorporating...

My main concern is the duplication of code. Is there a way to integrate it within the chrome script in a non-intrusive way? I'm already bothered by a large portion...

As mentioned, I'm kind of bothered by the duplication of code. See https://github.com/useful-forks/useful-forks.github.io/pull/21#issuecomment-849303400.