Pavel Tomin

> I don't know why, but the same test simulation in mass and mole are behaving differently (`MultiPhaseFluxStatisticsTestMol` has a timestep cut whereas `MultiPhaseFluxStatisticsTestMass` haven't any), here is the log...

@rrsettgast abandon?

> @wrtobin What do you think? I still think maybe we should do this even though it wasn't the culprit I was looking for @wrtobin @rrsettgast ping

move to merge queue?

merge queue?

> still need to rebaseline for new keyword, the restart tests fail... is the rebaselining automated yet ? i don't think the procedure has changed, but it does not make...

@tjb-ltk @CusiniM can we merge this? it's something useful for users, worth merging imho

Same issue for VTK case https://github.com/GEOS-DEV/GEOS/blob/develop/inputFiles/lagrangianContactMechanics/ContactMechanics_UnstructuredCrack_benchmark.xml ``` Time: 0.00e+00 s, dt: 1 s, Cycle: 0 ***** ERROR ***** LOCATION: /data/rpo_ptls/GEOSX/residual_flash/GEOS/GEOS/src/coreComponents/mesh/FaceElementSubRegion.cpp:414 ***** Controlling expression (should be false): true ***** Rank 7:...

related to https://github.com/GEOS-DEV/GEOS/issues/841 ?

> > Any updates on this PR? > > No further updates. I believe this Pull Request should resolve the performance problem. If required, I can modify this Pull Request...