Paulo Diniz comments

Results 7 comments of


                                            Paulo Diniz

Fix: support simple assertions as well.

@pawelma Thank you for your PR :) I updated the master branch so your branch has some conflicts

Update documentation and release new version

Sure. I'll add you! On what email?

Where's the hook?

You are right :+1: I took a look at minitest-vw, and I think it should be the base for that https://github.com/guilleiguaran/minitest-vw/blob/master/lib/minitest/vw.rb

Create command should not create configuration in case of failure

I agree with this feature, but doesn't this make the `init-only` option an edge case? Because the current behaviour if this flag is true, is that we create the config...

Create command should not create configuration in case of failure

@chrismatix I don't think we can do that way because if we defer the function, because the other operations will run and that's the opposite of `init-only`

Create command should not create configuration in case of failure

To be clear on where I stand: I would remove the `init-only` option

Create command should not create configuration in case of failure

Also, we do the `provision` of the provider using the config directory. Maybe I'm missing some context, but how can we do that if we create the config dir last?