Paul Smith

Oh I love that idea. Ensures they stay in sync with what is actually working. Love it! > On Mar 7, 2019, at 3:27 PM, robacarp wrote: > > My...

I'm wondering if maybe we should instead add some way to skip this check as mentioned in https://github.com/luckyframework/lucky/issues/1274. What do you think? Is this check helpful, or do you need...

Yeah Travis was originally because crystal had it so we modified it. Travis has since gone downhill a bit. I’d love to have a GitHub actions file built in and...

And thanks for the kind words! Welcome to Lucky 🍀

@arschles We're glad yo have you! And yes some guides would be really cool. Maybe in the new testing section! The gist is that you would duplicate one of these...

See #154 for some comments on what needs to be done. We need a new `LuckyWeb::StaticHandler` that works similarly to ones used in Amber and Kemal. It would add etags,...

This is what I meant and I think it should work. The `->` is weird in that Crystal seems to get a type restriction from it too. For example https://play.crystal-lang.org/#/r/9r36/edit...

Yeah this is dev only! :D

Just seeing this now. I do think the current behavior is the "least surprising" but I do get what you mean @confact. I think ideally we keep the current behavior...

@citizen428 I think something like that sounds awesome. I think the best bet would be to have a third part shard until we figure out exactly what Channels should look...