Paul Rodwell
Paul Rodwell
If you are going to want to anything with the data other than simple present it as a table then a alternative solution would be to extend the data plugin,...
> Inspired by the broken federation between two already existing Wikis, as seen here and there This is really an example of the lack of plugin discovery. @interstar (Phil Jones)...
Something feels wrong, I wonder... Rather than have different plugins, and content types, to provide editing with different markup. Wouldn't it be better to use a single content type `paragraph`...
No, nothing to do with content being static. I am suggesting that for 'text' content rather than creating a different container for each different authoring markup that a different approach...
Regarding the _workgroup separated from the internet_ while it is something of an outlier, needing to be self contained. I can see this just being one end of a spectrum...
sandstorm.io was mentioned in yesterday's hangout
Favourable, though I'm not sure how much depth it has been looked at yet, or if anybody has it up and running yet - from a cursory glance it looks...
@opn I don't think so, I only ever wilderness camped...
From memory, you will at the very least need to create a custom version of the wiki-node package - sandstorm appears to put the package at root which causes `path.join`...
Currently the OpenShift quickstart does not include the code to config federated wiki so that it starts in farm mode. While in theory this should be simple, I think I...