patst

> @patst Also interested to get this merged to get it available in the next release. Any help needed ? I don't want to open a new PR in //....

I think I sorted out the merge conflicts and got everything cleaned up. Still failing to test it locally, somehow the checkbox is not getting synced correctly into the extensions...

If I understand the limitations correct it does not work for any pod traffic (even when the Pods are on different nodes) while using Azure CNI Dynamic Ip Assignment. Would...

Would be great to have the path customizable as well. We use different hostnames per API fronted by an Application Gateway and redirect them to the managed gateway with path/...

> I'm not sure what the consequences of this kind of change could be, especially given that E2E tests don't run on these changed images as part of PR checks....

I think it is related to this change: https://github.com/grafana/crossplane-provider-grafana/blob/fa1f8833e2fd07bad16c09c7b47e84745b5de42c/apis/alerting/v1alpha1/zz_generated.resolvers.go#L581 introduced with https://github.com/grafana/crossplane-provider-grafana/commit/4807919200b3097df426cf2b20ec427099b81d77

> I think this is related to [crossplane/crossplane-tools#106](https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane-tools/pull/106) I agree! I am wondering of the current version of the provider is usable at all with that behaviour or if the...

Seeing the same error. Our collector is not meshed and the helm chart states the `proxy.tracing.collector.meshIdentity` value should be left blank (see https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd2/blob/92560826782c1e4268f9f717a709ecc97d365112/charts/linkerd-control-plane/values.yaml#L295-L298 ). Unfortunately leaving it blank results in...