Patrick Dowling
Patrick Dowling
Hey, sorry, as far as I know there's no systematic fix yet.
I know it's a bit unsatisfactory, but I can only echo what I've said before -- you should be taking it up with Plum and they should be organising a...
Yeah, space is a bit tight but I think it'd fit somewhere. Shay mentioned wanting it to be saved per app which is a bit more involved (it'd either have...
The incomplete state kind of irks me as well (even if it's not really my circus). My personal preference would be that Shay have his own fork(s), put the releases...
So I don't remember the pinout specifics, but half-remember it being feasible at least. Assuming that's the case the most 3.2-specific part is that the firmware works around (against?) the...
> Also... the current ad hoc framework and apps weren’t really designed to scale, so the foundation for expansion is a bit wobbly. At least that’s my regretrospective view, and...
There was also some work done for a 3.6 upgrade but I don't recall how far that got (see some discussions [here](https://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2958774#p2958774)). The refactoring branch -- excitingly named `wip/io` --...
Generally if it's going into master the version number should be bumped also (so it's kind of preferable to merge from a version branch but we usually handled this somewhat...
> This repos is inactive, so it is better to use yours ? I'd call mine marginally less inactive at best, not sure if that qualifies as "better" 😉
Just to clarify: It works on the normal o_C, but not the OCP?