Patrick Hammer

Thank you! This PR is a good fit for the Portability branch: https://github.com/opennars/OpenNARS-for-Applications/tree/portability This branch is better suitable as it does not depend on POSIX and Windows support for POSIX...

It is good that it does not need Cygwin but only MinGW now. Maybe it can be called build_mingw.cmd and be added to the portability branch?

I agree. Portability branch has no NetworkNAR, so this issue would resolve itself there and could simplify the compilation script potentially (to remove any POSIX reference at least)

Can you please re-open the PR to target the Portability branch? The script seems to be fine there. CPP and Portability branch are kept in synch with Master, the next...

Thank you, yes! :)

I agree, robust learning is not achieved for this particular example. I also have a test script which runs it with different seeds to evaluate it, I can commit it...

Due to he new extended numerical term handling this demo is obsolete. A new demo with the new numeric terms that allow to reason on - absolute values - value...

Awesome that you found this, thank you! And I will think about a solution to replacing `NAR_AddInputBelief(feedbackTerm)` there.

One can pipe the `*concept` command output to **concept_usefulness_filter.py** and pipe it from there to **concepts_to_graph.py**. Examples can be seen in https://github.com/opennars/OpenNARS-for-Applications/wiki/Misc-Scripts Example graph outputs have been part of v0.8.7...

However: While *concepts output can be recorded at multiple times while the system is running, it would need a new or updated script to cover the dynamic updating of the...