pasi-paasiala comments

Repositories
Issues
Comments

Results 13 comments of


                                            pasi-paasiala

pass-predefined_properties_are_supported_but_discouraged_1_2

Remove the test case in 1.0.

Optionality of restriction base

I agree that there shouldn't be two ways to do the same thing. Here the question was about IFC entity. Should we add a new data type IfcClass (or something)?...

Testcase "[PASS] Integer values are checked using type casting 2 & 3/4"

@pjanck suggested that [this test case](https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/master/Documentation/testcases-property.md#pass-integer-values-are-checked-using-type-casting-24) should fail the auditing. The test case should be removed or moved to a different folder, e.g. auditing.