Pascal Duez

If you look at the Neat theme there's no hacking involved to make it work. So this is currently already possible.

Agree with you @HugoGiraudel. But yes, we should probably prevent the annotation from renaming the variable.

https://twitter.com/slicknet/status/782274190451671040

It feels like that something users might want, and would be more familiar with: passing the option into the gulp/grunt/... task rather than from the command line. Semantically yes, we...

@valeriangalliat how would that work with the JSON file dumping ? Maybe not needed ? Might be a good idea to move all the debug logic into its own file...

Hi @bencresty, you could add your own annotation and build your own theme to achieve this. I know it might sound like a lot of work, but shouldn't be, except...

Hi, the Parser is expecting the SCSS syntax to be able to correctly delimit code blocks. So at the moment this is not possible. Related #236

Fucked idea of the month: a `sassdoc-extras` filter that convert the code blocks back to Sass with `sass-convert` :trollface:

The Quick & Dirty™ fix is not going to happen. That would mean opening a child-process for each code snippet, definitely a no go. If `sass-comment-parser` would be the preferred...

> I have no idea of a clean solution right now, apart from writing a sass-comment-parser. If we see a large amount of +1s on this issue, I'm okay to...