Partydragen

Thanks for reporting the issue, I have confirmed the bug

> I'm confused what functionality this provides, in your example commit the `customParams` is never read from/called. Can you perhaps explain a different way? Its being added to execute function...

Yea then its the question we discussed before to use Queue system as it kinda belongs in there, But at the same time it don't and might be better with...

> Something to consider with this approach would be how we store these "actions" that haven't been synced yet, and also how we know if we should store them or...

Well not a bug thought, as the user is inactive you have banned a user that is inactive never verified the account so the error is correct that the user...

its a bug, user account should not be set inactive

> Moved to 2.1.0 because the approach of adding an additional parameter is an API change Yet is it a bug fix, Aswell this change is not a breaking change...