Patrick Quist

I was thinking maybe we could solve it in a similar way as https://github.com/compiler-explorer/compiler-explorer/issues/3682 and https://github.com/compiler-explorer/compiler-explorer/issues/1966 even though they're not really equivalent (like stdlib version versus c++ version)

Not sure I noticed this issue before, but the `compilerType` `win32` is mostly just for various Visual Studio versions through native or wsl. It is not intended for other compilers...

As described in other issue, this is a Windows specific library in MASM, which we don't support by default and won't work with most compilers. It might work for Visual...

Also related to this: https://github.com/compiler-explorer/compiler-explorer/issues/3015

The 1.62 version for rand has indeed not been built. This is mainly because of `--all-features` - we might have to see if we can switch it off for rand....

Oh, there's actually something wrong with our buildprocess as well

1.62 crates should be there now

Right, sorry, but this was very much an intentional choice. We'll have to first have a feel in general how expensive the current situation is. Nightly building 100+ libraries might...

Sounds quite plausible. Thanks for the bugreport

It was still on 'master' instead of 'main'. I have changed it, but the binaries will still need to rebuild tonight, so I'll keep this issue open for a bit.