Patrick Gansterer

Unfortunately not. Most groups just use smaller "base units" as "workaround" at the moment. That's the reason why it's so low on the priority list.

I personally like the "Let the client work it out" approach combined with "Access token scopes" the most. IMHO all endpoints must return the same structure of data: users with...

Ist this still an issue? I can't reproduce it.

as you say, the dependency on `less-rails` should not be very difficult to replace with something else. if you create a PR replacing `less-rails` with something else, I see no...

> To me these sound like good features for a plugin, with Foodsoft providing the flexibility to hook into this. Not to me. This financial stuff is too much core...

> I a little worried that Foodsoft is becoming more complex than necessary. This are all features used by multiple foodcoops in Austria, so it's not very specific. Since it...

> Can another developer give me an opinion on that statement? I personally have no real idea about what what kind of statistics we want to get out of foodsoft....

> Hm... Yes, but the side effect of this is, that there is no distribution, right? The distributions happens after receiving an order and has noting to do with the...

oh, is see where this misunderstanding comes from. my idea of _no automatic distribution_ was that nothing happens. this means that if i order 2, but only 1 gets delivered...

sorry of not being precise again. i imagine an select box "distribution strategy" (or any better name and independent of `:charge_members_manually`) for the setting with three items: * first order...