Pedro Augusto de Paula Barbosa

> **rimraf** node supports recursive option now Are you really sure Node.js' new option entirely replaces rimraf, including all the crazy hacks it has to make it work on Windows?

> Large inline type definitions may shadow trailing unions with pre-existing types. Hello, can you clarify what you mean by _shadow_? Are you referring just to readability, or something else?

I agree with @mmkal > This rule would never be perfect. But I think without too much effort it could make virtually everyone happy 95% of the time. The people...

@fisker Maybe `no-invalid-await` or `no-non-thenable-await`?

@fisker Oops you're right. So `no-unnecessary-await`?

> Or > > ```diff > const foo = 1; > + if (bar) { > const {foo: anotherFoo} = bar; // `foo` is available in the new scope now,...

I followed your steps and got 4 seconds on my computer.

No idea...

Can you update your post with the exact code before autofix and after autofix? In particular, `for (int i=0;` is not valid

@PythonCoderAS And what is the output after autofixing?