Andreas Lind

Try to come up with an alternative to "to satisfy assertion"

11

... That works better with the `` type and is more well defined and documented. I want to avoid this construct in all assertions that end with "satisfying" and accept...

Allow more than one assertion string?

13

@gertsonderby asked about whether Unexpected 10 would help with making the assertions more grammatically correct by allowing "filler words" in the argument list, and I thought about that for a...

@PabloSichert asked me what `` meant, and it dawned upon me that it's not documented anywhere. The quantifiers are used in the examples, but they aren't explained.

Pass custom options to inspect/diff?

1

Currently the only thing that can be adjusted is the `depth`. I've run into some cases where it would be handy if `inspect` and `diff` accepted some options that the...

Explicit type cast when asserting, inspecting, and diffing

3

So that the base types can be utilized better. Something like: ``` js expect(expect.cast('object', new Error('blah')), 'to equal', {message: 'blah'}); function MyThing() {} expect.addType({ name: 'myThing', base: 'object', identify: function...

@Munter saw an error with unexpected-dom that seems to be caused by an `HTMLInputElement` throwing when the `selectionDirection` property is accessed under some circumstances. ``` js it('should not check any...

sRGB.icc: Leaked file descriptor?

24

I'm debugging a minor leak problem with a sharp-based service I'm running. From /proc/$PID/fd I can tell that over time, it seems to acquire more and more open file descriptors...

I "accidentally" tried setting a negative amount of before context and got: ``` $ ag foo . -B-1 ag(31443,0x70000c51c000) malloc: *** error for object 0xf000000000000000: pointer being freed was not...

urlencoded: Support iso-8859-1, utf8 sentinel, and numeric entities

20

Fixes #194 Further elaborations here: https://github.com/ljharb/qs/pull/268 Supports both the simple and extended parsers as outlined in https://github.com/ljharb/qs/pull/268#issuecomment-409195381 -- and doesn't use the equivalent capabilities of the qs module. Note: This...

Following up from https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/pull/326