Panagiotis Papadopoulos
Panagiotis Papadopoulos
I think this is intended "default" behaviour as per the standard: but your use case also is valid, but must be handled a bit more special, when it comes to...
Hi Songyue, thanks for the updates. One thing I probably would still change is the RegExp -> instead of checking the Aba number with two separate RegExp, you could combine...
> Just for my curiosity, for the RegEx benchmarking, which tool did you use? It is very useful to get number of ops per sec. I am using [Benchmark.js](https://www.npmjs.com/package/benchmark) for...
Looks good to me now, that the sanitization is removed :-) thanks
Hi @imkrishh, thanks for the PR. For future reference, here's also the ITU numbering plan, which is always a more accurate reference than a Wikipedia entry: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/02/02/T02020000E80006PDFE.pdf It looks like...
Thanks for this, however from what I can tell, the information is based on the Wikipedia entry, right? It seems that the entry is outdated, Wikipedia info is dated 2010,...
@sneznaj thanks for the PR, but as @braaar pointed out, introducing landline phone numbers into the `isMobilePhone` validator, is not correct. I'm marking this as "marked for close" and will...
as I haven't received any feedback, I'm closing the PR here, thanks for your effort though.
@girishpadia Does that answer your question? If so, could you close the issue please? Thanks!
closing this, as this is not part of this project. The issue belongs to the following project: https://github.com/mikeerickson/validatorjs