paluh

Maybe it will be better to not assume 'yes', but to allow user choose an option which will force 'yes' for all installed aur packages. I want to use paktahn...

> I might tackle this some time in the future, it should be easy to add. That would be great! Unfortunately I'm not able to help you, as my Lisp...

@fehrenbach thanks for quick response! I think that separating library could be a good step even before this compiler integration related discussion... For sure it could be a good step...

@fehrenbach Yeah, I'm depending on the whole library right now and it's not a problem at all for me 😉 I've opened this issue because I thought that this module...

Just for a reference (and possible further discussion) I've also proposed this quite lightweight type safe form of extensible existential: https://try.purescript.org/?gist=d0bff9054bfe49a916365f2b431afa0c

This seems to be cause on the current `nixpkgs/master`: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/70980#issuecomment-575884859

This should be fixed on the master now thanks to the [@jtojnar quick reaction](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/07b8ab4ff791dc8bcfeea643fd9a1fbedc534bbd). I'm not sure if we can close this for now?

@jtojnar I think that to test this on master we have to also bump nixops version (which has not been released yet) because of this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixops/commit/61abd34c4a67a230f0823af805a9e7439a9ba3be

P.S. @Thimoteus It seems that we can rip this piece from `pscid` or `pulp`.

I've not done this before too. It seems that `literate-purescript` is already taken on npm. Do you think that `litps` is good as a package name?