Phillip Alday
Phillip Alday
#637 pulled in
The problem with Kenward-Roger is that it calls for the inverse of an n_obs x n_obs matrix. There is a literal matrix inverse in `pbkrtest` which is what `lmerTest` uses...
For multinomial models, you can achieve something similar by moving the response-categories to the predictors side. If you're trying to predict responses, you have to do a post-processing step to...
I've marked this as "big future", but it might make more sense as a spin-off package, much like `clmm` in R uses `lme4` internally but all of the extra multinomial...
I'm not opposed to this, but it may be "lightly breaking" if any consumers are expected a concrete type instead of just a column table. That shouldn't hold us back...
Unfortunately not yet. Right now, we're focused on finishing up some work for the 3.0 series (at this point, mostly transferring all the improvements we did for LMM to GLMM...
The failing CI was related to a failure to download Gadfly for the docs. I've restarted it.
A quick look suggests that this is as embarrassingly parallel as the bootstrap, with the same shared memory issues for the model object. Should I add in multi-threading?
Then I'll probably leave it alone for now. I've been working on various parallelizable odds and ends lately, so I might come back for the practice reasoning about various concurrency...