Pablo Fernandez
Pablo Fernandez
I agree with @barkyq; I don't think we need to create complex conditioning and ranges, since we're raising the bar for relays and clients to properly implement NIP-26 too much....
> Looks good to me. Thoughts about a regexp support too? ``` content=/${CONTENT}/ ```
> No, that would be crazy. lol, thought so
> I'm not opposed at all, but would it make more sense to use a hash of the content, or is there a reason not to? Just feels like it...
> I do not understand a delegation condition for content description though, when that delegatee could just claim SFW and put whatever in the actual content. Restricting kinds & created_at...
> I am saying that, unlike the delegation restrictions that actually prevent a delegatee from posting kind X when only authorized for kind Y; there is no way for a...
> Looks nice. What's the intended use case for this? I can think of some funny ones, like giving permission to send kind=7 reactions that are only dislikes or likes...
> > Yeah, another use case I was talking with @scsibug about is, for example, going to see a world cup final, and you want to have a "Congrats Argentina!"...
> My gut says there must be a better way than giving an untrusted third party a delegation token. But perhaps for apps which cannot connect to a browser extension,...
> What else is this PR good for beyond allowing people to send emojis? What other fixed content strings do you anticipate? Any kind of content; this has a simple...