Perl 5 RT

Results 852 comments of Perl 5 RT

### From [email protected] On Aug 19\, Randal L\. Schwartz wrote​: > >>>>> "Kurt" == Kurt Starsinic \ writes​: > Kurt> It seems very strange to me to say that an...

### From [email protected] On Wednesday\, August 20\, 2003\, at 04​:31 am\, Kurt Starsinic wrote​: > So it seems to me that\, in Perl\, a named subroutine is never a >...

### From @iabyn On Tue\, Aug 19\, 2003 at 11​:31​:48PM \-0400\, Kurt Starsinic wrote​: > I suggest that it's a closure when the language supports > associating bindings to the...

### From @iabyn On Wed\, Aug 20\, 2003 at 07​:12​:22PM \+0100\, Nick Ing\-Simmons wrote​: > Dave Mitchell \ writes​: > >But named subs also capture their lexical state at creation...

### From [email protected] Dave Mitchell \ writes​: >On Tue\, Aug 19\, 2003 at 11​:31​:48PM \-0400\, Kurt Starsinic wrote​: >> I suggest that it's a closure when the language supports >>...

### From [email protected] #### Created by [email protected] perl \-wle 'sub DESTROY \{ print "DESTROY" \} my $a = bless sub \{\}; $a=undef' The DESTROY never gets called\. Perl Info ```...

### From @iabyn On Sun\, Oct 17\, 2004 at 09​:10​:49PM \-0000\, perl\-5\. 8\. 0 @​ ton\. iguana\. be wrote​: > perl \-wle 'sub DESTROY \{ print "DESTROY" \} my $a...

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

### From @nwc10 On Mon\, Oct 18\, 2004 at 05​:02​:13PM \+0100\, Dave Mitchell wrote​: > On Sun\, Oct 17\, 2004 at 09​:10​:49PM \-0000\, perl\-5\. 8\. 0 @​ ton\. iguana\. be...

### From [email protected] Nicholas Clark \ wrote > Is it possible to retrospectively change a sub to be shared in the bless operator? Won't that make the reference point to...