Robert
Robert
Renaming the title of this issue for clarification.
Noting here for posterity, this links more closely to https://github.com/openresty/lua-resty-upload/issues/24 than other issues note above, as we leverage this library directly.
Unless lua-resty-upload has started supporting HTTP/2, then no ;)
Look into tying this into CRSv3 translation/setvar interface
See note in #239. Targeting v0.12
Started with straight ID removal in https://github.com/p0pr0ck5/lua-resty-waf/commit/6205c3850eb9796d34227c3e92810d6e7e2a74af
ctl:ruleEngine was done in https://github.com/p0pr0ck5/lua-resty-waf/commit/94a6563a5dbc57622761fdf379d740d93021b0e1
Hi, Thanks for the report. This is very similar to #232 and will be handled in that patch set.
These module options will likely go away in favor of direct SecRules translation, made much more consumable by the addition of the `setvar` module API. Planning refactor and deprecate this...
Hi, **Section Synopsis: explain what the effect is of calling waf:exec() in all of access_by_lua, header_filter_by_lua and body_filter_by_lua. why do you need to call waf:exec() in each of them?** Calling...