Prithvi Shahi

@ajnavarro what's the next step for this PR? Can it be closed?

The prescribed behavior by this issue isn't in accordance with the identify spec: https://github.com/libp2p/specs/tree/master/identify#identifypush Closing this for now

Many of these components have been refactored, so unsure if it's still applicable today. In case you do see this issue again, feel free to re-open or create a new...

We have a spec for inlined muxer negotiation which will save 1 RTT: https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/connections/inlined-muxer-negotiation.md Perhaps we can move to that. Closing this issue for now

Will not be implemented as it isn't supported by other libp2p implementations. Will focus on WebRTC, WebTransport, adding QUIC support, etc.

The connection has a streams property that lets you know how many streams are open/in-use. That can be used to determine wether the connection is in use or not. Closing...

What's remaining to do on this PR?

@momack2 Any reason to include js-ipfs specifically? This work is not progressing with it in mind. We will need it for Helia but I would still not include any project...

Didn't see the replies above but I support adding the repo-name to the milestone cards

Blocked on https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/issues/1852