[QA] suggested firewall rules are not actionable
WHAT Needs to be Documented?
More details about the firewall suggestions for our appliance.
- 5.9.68.237 is the ip-addr of marketplace.owncloud.com
- 176.9.114.147 is the ip-addr of both docker.software-univention.de and software-univention.de
WHERE Does This Need To Be Documented (Link)?
https://github.com/owncloud/docs/blob/master/modules/admin_manual/pages/appliance/configuration/firewall.adoc
WHY Should This Change Be Made?
No admin should ever add an unexplained IP-Address to his firewall. Each hostname or IP address should have a reaseon. Rules without port numbers are unspecific. We need to explain at least the ip-addresses. (The dns names could be considered more or less selfexplanatory and admins could guess that port 443 is sufficient.)
(Optional) What Type Of Content Change Is This?
- [x] Bug Fix to Existing Content
(Optional) Which Manual Does This Relate To?
- [x] Admin Manual
Keep in mind this could change at any time (and need to be updated in the docs) so hard-coded IPs might be a bad idea. Maybe document how to get the current IP? Or just mention how e.g. iptables works. If you add an n allow rule with a domain name, iptables will resolve it automatically and add the current used IP to the rule set (but does NOT auto-update DNS changes, of course).
I will find a way to address both views.
https://github.com/owncloud/firewall/issues/694 ([QA] De-Morgan's law is confusing)