EDTA icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
EDTA copied to clipboard

Issues related to the interpretation of the results of TEanno.gff3 and TElib.fa

Open Song-10-YF opened this issue 1 year ago • 1 comments

Hello! In TEanno.gff3, TE_00000019 actually has multi-locus repeats on each chromosome, so do these TE_00000019 need to be merged and spliced again? Or do these transposons already contain the full LTR structural domain and are independent LTR elements? What is the relationship between these TE_00000019 sequences and TElib.fa? Also I found inconsistent annotation results in TEanno.gff3, how can I fix it?

My command. --species others --overwrite 1 --sensitive 1 --anno 1 --evaluate 1 --curatedlib chr16.TElib.fa --threads 30

Doubtful results are as follows: 31715:Chr01 EDTA LTR_retrotransposon 27330977 27331387 2175 - . ID=TE_homo_30935;Name=TE_00000019;Classification=LTR/unknown;Sequence_ontology=SO:0000186;Identity=0.912;Method=homology 35455:Chr01 EDTA LINE_element 29695752 29695931 513 - . ID=TE_homo_34622;Name=TE_00000019;Classification=LINE/unknown;Sequence_ontology=SO:0000194;Identity=0.751;Method=homology 35666:Chr01 EDTA LTR_retrotransposon 29823217 29823369 335 + . ID=TE_homo_34833;Name=TE_00000019;Classification=LTR/unknown;Sequence_ontology=SO:0000186;Identity=0.796;Method=homology

Best, Song

Song-10-YF avatar Feb 12 '23 05:02 Song-10-YF