Change wording (outside of tesseract references)

[jabberwock]

Let's get better with our use of words.

• https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/blog-post/terminology-its-not-black-and-white
• https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7dd3d/we-need-to-stop-saying-blacklist-and-whitelist
• https://insights.dice.com/2020/07/17/whitelist-blacklist-the-new-debate-over-security-terminology/

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #253 (e704654) into main (5b1b5d5) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #253   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.08%   79.08%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         263      263           
=======================================
  Hits          208      208           
  Misses         51       51           
  Partials        4        4           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
client.go	79.08% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[jabberwock]

Thank you for addressing this!

[otiai10]

@jabberwock can you please rebase this pull request or anything to resolve the conflict?

[jabberwock]

The whole purpose was to change the wording. Not to leave it in. I won't be making any more changes. Take care.