node-continuation-local-storage
node-continuation-local-storage copied to clipboard
add a shared namespace
trafficstars
What's the use case behind this? In principle, I have no objection, but I'd like to understand what you're trying to do. Also, before this gets merged, it'll need tests and documentation.
Instead of some “shared namespace” why not just use an agreed-upon namespace name? I agree with @othiym23, the goal of this PR is unclear and the only use cases I can guess at are nonsensical.