Tabletop Exercise

[scovetta]

We should conduct a tabletop exercise for different review scenarios, including:

• Normal Review -> Someone submits a review PR, which gets reviewed, and then merged.
• Disputed Review -> Someone flags a review as inappropriate. "We" agree, and change the review accordingly.
• Two-Sided Dispute -> There's genuine good-faith difference of opinion in an important part of a review.
• Bias Accusation -> Someone accuses the project maintainers of bias because X was merged but Y was not.
• Accidental Merge -> We accidentally merge something that shouldn't have been.
• Accidental Merge / Chaos -> We accidentally merge something that really, really, really shouldn't have been.
• New Maintainer -> Someone wants to join the project and review PRs as they come in.
• Don't Link to Me -> Someone includes a link to a 3rd party review, that 3rd party takes issue with the linking and asks us to take it down.

I'm sure there are more scenarios.