Add functionality to web report to filter issues by path
Add search functionality instead of filter to prevent issues with displaying a long list of filters.
Fixes #5130
Signed-off-by: Stefano Bennati [email protected]
Please ensure that your pull request adheres to our contribution guidelines. Thank you!
Some commit message hints:
- Please don't add any emoticons.
- Properly end sentences with a dot.
- Add the
Signed-off-byto the commit message, not only to the PR discussion.
Codecov Report
:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 52.12%. Comparing base (227a258) to head (91913f4).
:warning: Report is 7472 commits behind head on main.
:exclamation: There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (227a258) and HEAD (91913f4). Click for more details.
HEAD has 3 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (227a258) HEAD (91913f4) funTest-analyzer-docker 1 0 test 1 0 funTest-non-analyzer 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5136 +/- ##
=============================================
- Coverage 65.16% 52.12% -13.05%
+ Complexity 2012 1328 -684
=============================================
Files 328 240 -88
Lines 16715 12245 -4470
Branches 2189 1742 -447
=============================================
- Hits 10893 6383 -4510
- Misses 4757 5197 +440
+ Partials 1065 665 -400
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| funTest-analyzer-docker | ? |
|
| funTest-non-analyzer | ? |
|
| test | ? |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
The fixup commit still needs to be squashed into the first one.
@bennati, @tsteenbe, how should we proceed with this?
Closing pull request as functionality added in it was implemented in a different way in https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/pull/9804