editor-layer-index icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
editor-layer-index copied to clipboard

Published 20 hours ago • verified publisher icon osmlab

Are imagery.json / imagery.xml still needed?

Open rbuffat opened this issue 3 years ago • 6 comments
trafficstars

Next to imagery.geojson we produce imagery.json and imagery.xml? Are these files still used by anybody? If not, we should stop creating them.

CC @grischard, @simonpoole @bhousel @bryceco @Klumbumbus @systemed @tyrasd

rbuffat avatar Feb 07 '22 23:02 rbuffat

Potlatch uses imagery.json.

systemed avatar Feb 07 '22 23:02 systemed

I think JOSM'S ImageryCompare uses the josm-format XML. The conversion also makes imports of entries towards josm less complicated.

grischard avatar Feb 07 '22 23:02 grischard

Vespucci has used the 'standard' geojson output for a long time.

simonpoole avatar Feb 08 '22 11:02 simonpoole

iD currently still uses the "legacy" imagery.json, but I plan to switch to the .geojson version pretty soon.

tyrasd avatar Feb 08 '22 15:02 tyrasd

imagery.xml also allows people to choose to use ELI in JOSM rather than JOSM's index, I was using it for a while.

andrewharvey avatar May 19 '22 11:05 andrewharvey

Potlatch 3 also uses imagery.json

grischard avatar Jul 07 '22 17:07 grischard