osmose-backend
osmose-backend copied to clipboard
osm-fr
Part of osmose that runs the analysis, and send the results to the frontend.
Hello, The title says all: as a non-insider, where can I find the code for this analysis? Thanks for the answer.
Here are a few new analysis about Simple Indoor Tagging, checking for connectivity and a few mandatory attributes. It is part of an OSM Hackathon that have gathered OSM users...
New attempt based on feedback in #1521 (new PR as it's mostly a rewrite; keeps things clean :) ) Fixes #1499 - Check for potential driveway/drive-through mix-ups. 1. Start from...
This patch removes the test in Osmose as part of #1533 Prior to applying, the updated JOSM rules should be imported in Osmose and in the ideal case, the parsing...
Osmose is proposing me to integrate this shop that closed down in 2015: name | Belle Optique | https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Belle Optique -- | -- | -- ref:FR:SIRET | 43775835200045 | https://avis-situation-sirene.insee.fr/ListeSiretToEtab.action?form.nic=00045&form.siren=437758352...
Discovered this while working on the drive-through check: item 1210, class 2 says: https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/c6c0e8a4598495c3b21c308081dbda92be0d1717/analysers/analyser_osmosis_highway_deadend.py#L230-L231 However, the check only looks for `level < 3` ways https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/c6c0e8a4598495c3b21c308081dbda92be0d1717/analysers/analyser_osmosis_highway_deadend.py#L50 while `tertiary` roads are `level...
When mapping areas of landuse, the removal of the standard area=yes tag is occasionally forgotten as not required. It gets flagged with "landuse`, already make this an area". The same...
_May require feedback_ Found on wiki page for [`amenity=toilets`](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets#Toilets_within_places) > Please do not use toilet=yes (singular). Taginfo: [`toilet`](https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/toilet#overview)
Hello, As discussed on talk-fr, it seems that the analysis concerning item #6070 (Survey point out of boundary) is no longer relevant. To be deleted?
The [JOSM numeric mapcss rules](https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/resources/data/validator/numeric.mapcss) contain ``` way[maxspeed][maxspeed !~ /^(signals|none|unposted|variable|walk|[1-9][0-9]*( [a-z]+)?|[A-Z][A-Z]:(urban|rural|living_street|motorway))$/], way[maxspeed:forward][maxspeed:forward !~ /^(signals|none|unposted|variable|walk|[1-9][0-9]*( [a-z]+)?|[A-Z][A-Z]:(urban|rural|living_street|motorway))$/], way[maxspeed:backward][maxspeed:backward !~ /^(signals|none|unposted|variable|walk|[1-9][0-9]*( [a-z]+)?|[A-Z][A-Z]:(urban|rural|living_street|motorway))$/] { throwWarning: tr("unusual value of {0}: {1} is default; only positive...